>I don't know about these rankings. Huff Above Blalock? Not to>sure about that. Is that because they used to toss Huff>anywhere they needed to fill a spot that day, and as a result>got some points for being a multi-position player? Blalock>wins on skills and ability in my book.I was looking at Blalock last night (prepping for my draft), and I was incredibly surprised to see the number of strikeouts that this guy had... and it is probably because of this that Huff gets the nod.Blalock: 624 AB, .276 AB, 107 R, 32 HR, 110 RBI, 2 SB, 149 Ks, 75 BBHuff: 600 AB, .297, 92 R, 29 HR, 104 RBI, 5 SB, 74 K, 56 BBAnd, remembering that Huff really was stinking up the place the first half of last year, yet still posted respectable numbers, the predictors are expecting him to continue that tear.Me, too, personally.
|
3803 reads
|